• Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Subscribe
    • Change Mailing Address
    • Surveys
    • Guidelines for Authors
    • Editorial Calendar and Deadlines
    • Dynamic Chiropractic
      • Newspaper
      • Subscription
    • The American Chiropractor
      • Magazine
  • Practice
    • Business Tips
    • Chiropractic Schools
    • Clinical & Technique
    • Ebooks
    • Ecourses
    • Sponsored Content
    • Infographics
    • Quizzes
    • Wellness & Nutrition
    • Podcast
  • Content Hubs
  • Products & Services
    • View Products & Services Directory
    • Browse Buyers Guide
    • Submit a Product
    • Vendor Login
  • Datebook
    • View Events
    • Post an Event
    • Become an Events Poster
  • Advertise
    • Advertising Information
    • Media Kit
    • Contact Us

Your Online Practice Partner

Chiropractic Economics
Your Online Practice Partner
Advertise Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • Webinars
  • Chiropractic Research
  • Students/New DCs

N.J. DCs win back rights to extraspinal adjustments

Chiropractic Economics June 19, 2008

New Jersey chiropractors are again able to perform extraspinal adjustments. The New Jersey Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Bedford v. Riello on June 18, according to Sig Miller, DC, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Chiropractors (ANJC).

 

The court, with two justices dissenting, held that the regulations concerning chiropractic scope of practice  “permit manipulation of articulations beyond those of the spine when there is a causal nexus between a condition of the manipulated structure and a condition of the spine.” 

 

The court further held that, “whether  adjustment of a particular portion of the body is permissible as a ‘related structure’ under the rule must be determined and demonstrated by the practitioner on a case-by-case basis, focusing on whether a condition to the adjusted structure bears a causal relationship to a condition of the spine.”

 

“This is a resounding victory for all chiropractors in New Jersey as well as other states who have been closely monitoring this precedential case.,” said Miller in an e-mail. “The case was remanded for retrial on the malpractice issue, but the decision is effective June 18, 2008, permitting chiropractors to adjust extraspinal areas provided they document a causal nexus to a condition of the spine.”

 

Source: Association of New Jersey Chiropractors, www.anjc.info

Related Posts

  • AHPA announces results of 2010 board of trustees electionAHPA announces results of 2010 board of trustees election
  • Logan College of Chiropractic students spend day at Standard Process Inc.Logan College of Chiropractic students spend day at Standard Process Inc.
  • Laurel J. Freeman receives humanitarian awardLaurel J. Freeman receives humanitarian award
  • ErgoExpo Experiences Attendance Growth; Highest Exhibit Space Renewal Rate in Show HistoryErgoExpo Experiences Attendance Growth; Highest Exhibit Space Renewal Rate in Show History
  • COCSA joins class action against UnitedHealth GroupCOCSA joins class action against UnitedHealth Group

Filed Under: Chiropractic News, News

Current Issue

Issue 18 cover

Get Exclusive Content! Join our email list

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube logoYouTube logoYouTube

Compare Subscriptions

Dynamic Chiropractic

The American Chiropractor

8430 Enterprise Circle, Suite 200

Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202

Phone 800-671-9966

CONTACT US »

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Copyright © Chiropractic Economics, A Gallagher Company. All Rights Reserved.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE MAGAZINE

Get Chiropractic Economics magazine
delivered to your home or office. Just fill out our form to request your FREE subscription for 20 issues a year,
including two annual Buyers Guides.

SUBSCRIBE NOW »

Proud Sponsor of the Foundation for Chiropractic Progress
Issue 19 cover