• Magazine
    • Past Issues
    • Subscribe
    • Change Mailing Address
    • Surveys
    • Guidelines for Authors
    • Editorial Calendar
    • Editorial Deadlines
    • Dynamic Chiropractic
      • Newspaper
      • Subscription
    • The American Chiropractor
      • Magazine
  • Practice
    • Business Tips
    • Chiropractic Schools
    • Clinical & Technique
    • eBooks
    • eCourses
    • Sponsored Content
    • Infographics
    • Quizzes
    • Wellness & Nutrition
    • Personal Growth
    • Podcast
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
  • Resource Centers
  • Products & Services
    • Buyers Guide
    • Products Directory
    • Submit a Product
    • Vendor Login
  • Datebook
    • Become an Events Poster
    • Post an Event
    • View Events
  • Jobs
    • Jobs
    • Post a Job
  • Advertise
    • Advertising Information
    • Media Kit
    • Contact Us

Your Online Chiropractic Community

Chiropractic Economics Your Online Chiropractic Community
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • News
  • Webinars
  • Chiropractic Research
  • Students

The unreliability of conventional musculoskeletal assessment

Chiropractic Economics April 8, 2013

By Anthony J. Lombardi, DCspine

The conventional assessment of musculoskeletal injuries has traditionally been performed in a vacuum. A chiropractor treating a patient with elbow pain typically performs elbow orthopedic testing, while a patient with low-back pain undergoes an exam that focuses on straight-leg raise and sacroiliac joint tests. Patients with non-traumatic knee pain undergo every knee orthopedic test imaginable, until the chiropractor draws his or her own conclusion. Conventional assessment approaches often lead to incorrect interpretations of diagnostic imaging and conventional orthopedic testing (Jensen, 1994, Cadogan, 2011, Contant, 2003). When injuries are assessed in a vacuum, there are often discrepancies among the different diagnoses.

As clinicians, we are presented with injuries and different clinical presentations that challenge the way we assess our patients. Several landmark studies have shown that tissue tears revealed on imaging are very common in patients who are completely asymptomatic (Jensen, 1994, Worland, 2003, Oschman, 2007, Cadogan, 2011, Simpson, 2006, Contant, 2003). There is a lack of a causal relationship between diagnostic imaging results orthopedic testing, and symptoms. Thus, we must look further into what is happening on a musculoskeletal level when patients are experiencing pain and dysfunction.

                                 A New England Journal of Medicine study (Jensen, 1994) revealed that in a MRI examination of the lumbar spine, many people without back pain have disk bulges or protrusions. Given the high prevalence of these findings and of back pain sufferers, the discovery of bulges or protrusions by MRI in people with low back pain may frequently be just coincidental. A study focusing on rotator cuff tears (Worland, 2003) determined that approximately 40 percent of asymptomatic patients over the age of 50 have full-thickness rotator cuff tears. In a research paper (Oschman, 2007), it was reported that the high incidence of asymptomatic tears in the study group indicate rotator cuff tears can be regarded as a natural correlate of aging and that bilateral tears are common. There is an over-reliance on single orthopedic tests, which is unreliable (Contant, 2003) in clinical environments when assessing musculoskeletal dysfunction, and there is a lack of research to support conventional orthopedic testing (Cadogan, 2011)

With the advancement of manual therapy, we have learned and developed a multitude of standardized treatments – yet almost every chiropractor assesses their patients differently. In light of the research, it may be time that we re-evaluate how we approach assessment to provide more consistent clinical outcomes.

Anthony J. Lombardi, DC, can be reached at www.exstore.ca and exstore@usa.com

Related Posts

  • Doctors of chiropractic — use this form to support the Chiropractic Medicare Coverage Modernization ActDoctors of chiropractic — use this form to support the Chiropractic Medicare Coverage Modernization Act
  • The consolidation of the chiropractic professionThe consolidation of the chiropractic profession
  • The Vital Health Depot introduces StimTec2The Vital Health Depot introduces StimTec2
  • New York Chiropractic College to host premiere for documentary ‘Pain in America’New York Chiropractic College to host premiere for documentary ‘Pain in America’
  • The 2022 Chiropractic Economics Annual Fees & Reimbursements SurveyThe 2022 Chiropractic Economics Annual Fees & Reimbursements Survey
  • ACA sends research to 16,000 neurologistsACA sends research to 16,000 neurologists

Filed Under: Chiropractic Tables, Resource Center

Current Issue

CE issue 15 cover

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube logoYouTube logoYouTube

Compare Subscriptions

Dynamic Chiropractic

The American Chiropractor

3948 3rd Street South #279,

Jacksonville Beach, FL 32250

Phone 904-285-6020

CONTACT US »

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Copyright © 2023, All Rights Reserved

SUBSCRIBE TO THE MAGAZINE

Get Chiropractic Economics magazine
delivered to your home or office. Just
fill out our form to request your FREE
subscription for 20 issues a year,
including two annual Buyers Guides.

SUBSCRIBE NOW »

Latest Chiropractic News

  • NCMIC receives workplace and business honors
  • Parker Seminars presents “Invictus” and Annual Homecoming, Oct. 6-8
  • Palmer Dean of Research named most highly-published researcher in manual therapy