• Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Subscribe
    • Change Mailing Address
    • Surveys
    • Guidelines for Authors
    • Editorial Calendar and Deadlines
    • Dynamic Chiropractic
      • Newspaper
      • Subscription
    • The American Chiropractor
      • Magazine
  • Practice
    • Business Tips
    • Chiropractic Schools
    • Clinical & Technique
    • Ebooks
    • Ecourses
    • Sponsored Content
    • Infographics
    • Quizzes
    • Wellness & Nutrition
    • Podcast
  • Content Hubs
  • Products & Services
    • View Products & Services Directory
    • Browse Buyers Guide
    • Submit a Product
    • Vendor Login
  • Datebook
    • View Events
    • Post an Event
    • Become an Events Poster
  • Advertise
    • Advertising Information
    • Media Kit
    • Contact Us

Your Online Practice Partner

Chiropractic Economics
Your Online Practice Partner
Advertise Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • Webinars
  • Chiropractic Research
  • Students/New DCs

Low-level laser therapy in secondary lymphedema after breast cancer: systematic review

Chiropractic Economics Staff November 30, 2012

E Lima MT, E Lima JG, de Andrade MF, Bergmann A. Augusto Motta University Center-UNISUAM, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, marybiscaia@yahoo.com.br.

Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Nov 29. [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 23192573 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Abstract

Complex physical therapy is the main treatment for the secondary lymphedema after breast cancer. The low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been used in order to stimulate lymphangiogenesis, encourage lymphatic motility, and reduce lymphostatic fibrosis. However, these factors could also favor the development of recurrence and metastasis. The objective of this study is to discuss the use of LLLT in the treatment of lymphedema after breast cancer. This study utilized a systematic review on the use of LLLT in the treatment of lymphedema after breast cancer. Evaluating quality of articles was conducted through the PEDro scale. Of the 41 articles identified, four were considered to be of high methodological quality (score???5). The low-level laser in the axillary region was performed in all studies. The control group was not similar across studies. The results presented showed that there was a reduction in limb volume in the group subjected to low-power laser when compared with other treatments. No studies have evaluated the risk of metastasis or relapse in the irradiated areas. Because no studies have included the complex physical therapy as the comparison group, we cannot claim that laser treatment is the best efficacy or effectiveness in lymphedema treatment after breast cancer. No studies have evaluated the hypothesis that the LLLT can increase the risk of recurrence or metastasis. Therefore, the questions about the safety of this procedure in cancer patients remain.

Filed Under: Laser Therapy, Resource Center

Current Issue

Issue 2 2026 Chiropractic Economics

Get Exclusive Content! Join our email list

Sign Up

Thank you for subscribing!

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube logoYouTube logoYouTube

Compare Subscriptions

Dynamic Chiropractic

The American Chiropractor

8430 Enterprise Circle, Suite 200

Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202

Phone 800-671-9966

CONTACT US »

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Copyright © Chiropractic Economics, A Gallagher Company. All Rights Reserved.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE MAGAZINE

Get Chiropractic Economics magazine
delivered to your home or office. Just fill out our form to request your FREE subscription for 20 issues a year,
including two annual Buyers Guides.

SUBSCRIBE NOW »

Proud Sponsor of the Foundation for Chiropractic Progress