July 2003

Two NACA attorneys support Trigon appeal

Bob Hirtle, an attorney for the Connecticut Chiropractic Association, says that most antitrust cases come down to factual issues, and in the case of the Trigon lawsuit, "that's encouraging." He points out that if the chiropractic plaintiffs in the case can prove to the appeals court that members of the committee Trigon used to recommend its chiropractic policies were in fact competitors of doctors of chiropractic, then "they would be appropriate parties to constitute a conspiracy under antitrust laws.

It looks like the ACA has a good, solid basis for appeal,” he said.

Meanwhile, the California Chiropractic Association's Mike Schroeder, another attorney with antitrust expertise, says he was not overly alarmed by the judge's decision to dismiss the Trigon case. He points out that chiropractic overcame similar defeats in the Wilk suit and went on to win that case.

Schroeder believes Judge Jones made some "unwarranted leaps" in finding that the Trigon advisory board members were not DC competitors. "I don't think we're going to lose this appeal," Schroeder says.

He also thinks the chiropractic profession has already achieved a substantial victory through the Trigon suit with its earlier settlement arrangement with the national Blue Cross Blue Shield association, a move that opened new avenues of communication and cooperation between the two sides.

Schroeder is referring to the decision by the national Blue Cross Blue Shield to establish a chiropractic benefit in the federal health plan that it administers.

American Chiropractic Association

Industry News from:
Chiropractic News from: