<h1>Chiropractic News | Chiropractic Magazine</h1>
Your Online Chiropractic Community
 
 


Welcome to the Staffing and Employee
Relations Resource Center

« Back to the Staffing and Employee Relations Resource Center »

November 2008

Article Tools
Comment on this story

"Subjective process" showed signs of bias

Interviews are tricky — a candidate’s success or failure often depends on highly subjective criteria. But here’s an example of how too much subjectivity can wind up hitting a company with a bias lawsuit:

An African-American man applied for a job. Based on his experience, he was brought in to interview. He was turned down in favor of a white applicant. He sued for race discrimination — and won.

Why? Most of the evidence against the company came in the way interviewees were evaluated. All candidates were asked the same questions, but the way the answers were scored was highly subjective.

Each answer was


graded on a point system, but there didn’t seem to be a set formula for how points were awarded. For example, when asked about his attendance record, the man said he’d only ever missed a few days due to illness. A white applicant gave nearly the same answer, but got a much higher score.

The judge ruled that the subjective grading system was a cover for the hiring manager’s bias.

The company made the right choice by keeping the interview questions similar for all applicants — but didn’t carry the consistency through to the scoring.

Cite: Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority

Contributed by www.HRLegalNews.com

 

 

Comments


Be the first to comment on this Article

Name
 
Location
 
Comment

To submit your comment, please type the security word shown in the picture.
Remember information
 
 

 

Chiropractic Economics Magazine - A Chiropractic Publication


Back to the Staffing and Employee Relations Resource Center

 



   
Chiropractic Economics ©2009 | 5150 Palm Valley Rd. Suite 103 | Ponte Vedra Beach, FL 32082 | P:800.533.4263 F:904.285.9944