|
Can your practice profit
from digital radiography?
By Frederick R. Fischer
Most chiropractic equipment is
largely a one-time expense; but when it comes to radiography,
the expenses go on year after year, long after the equipment has
been paid off.
So the question becomes how to
curtail, or better yet, eliminate recurring expenses and start
building an imaging system that can transform a profit drain into
a profit center.
Start by looking at what it costs
you to run your current chemical X-ray processing system. Estimate
the number of films you take on a daily, weekly or monthly basis.
Even if you own your processor
outright, there are day-to-day expenses inherent in its use. Consider
the cost of film, chemicals, storage, chemical disposal, and maintaining
a darkroom as ongoing expenses that will continue as long as you
operate a traditional X-ray processor.
A consideration: Digital imaging.
Digital imaging processors require none of these consumables to
operate. Still, to see if converting to digital is a sound decision,
examine the cost of the new equipment available today. Computerized
radiography systems are not inexpensive. They are usually priced
between $32,000 and $40,000.
What is the cost of
chemical X-rays?
|
If you take eight films a day for 250 days a
year, the cost for chemical X-rays is the following: |
Daily film costs
|
| 14 x 17 films @$1.50 |
$12 |
| Replenisher, $0.50 |
$4 |
| Envelopes, @$0.25 |
$2 |
| Total daily film costs |
$18 |
Annual film costs |
| (250 x $17) |
$4,500 |
| Add 15% for duplicating and retakes |
$675 |
| Total annual film costs |
$5,175 |
Monthly costs |
| Chemicals |
$25 |
| Processor cleaning labor |
$60 |
| Waste disposal |
$50 |
| Total monthly costs |
$135 |
| Annualized monthly costs |
$1,620 |
Annual costs |
| Darkroom and film storage |
$2,000 |
| Processor repair |
$250 |
| Total |
$2,250 |
| Total annual cost of chemical X-rays |
$9,045 |
WHAT’S THE ROI?
If you have the capital to purchase
the system and do not need to finance, then you’ll be looking
at this as a long-term
investment that will begin saving
you money immediately. But what exactly is the return on investment
(ROI) for your practice?
Let’s assume you are processing
eight films daily. The annual cost savings for consumables and
other associated expenses will be just under $9,000 (see accompanying
chart). It would take you an average of four to five years to
recoup your investment in a digital system based on these savings.
Afterwards, you could enjoy the
use of that $9,000 each year, money you could funnel back into
your practice instead of spending on tiresome supplies. Obviously,
if you take more than eight films per day, you will see a faster
ROI.
BETTER QUALITY
Besides the dollars, does digital
make sense for your practice? Like most technological improvements,
digital offers tremendous benefits over the old standard and yields
advantages that can make a real difference to your practice. The
most immediate is increased imaging capability. It’s a superior
method of radiographic imaging — superior because it’s
faster.
The images can be enhanced and
more diagnostic information can be derived. Moreover, the software
helps you generate and draw accurate measurements right on the
computer image itself and allows you to do so more quickly and
easily than on standard film.
Digital images also have the advantage
of being in a format that can be sent to colleagues instantly
via e-mail for an immediate consultation or diagnostic confirmation.
Plus, the images can be burned onto CDs for just pennies, without
the need for a film duplicator.
All images are stored and backed
up electronically in your patient’s file; so, with a simple
mouse click, the current image can be viewed side-by-side with
a previous image to reveal improvements or changes in his or her
condition.
Other benefits
Furthermore, the patient can see
the image immediately on a monitor and you can point out the trouble
spots or indicate where improvements have taken place. You can
easily enhance visualization by colorizing, magnifying, or brightening
portions of the image to help isolate and pinpoint the problem
area. This helps to promote more constructive consultations with
your patients, and you’ll be giving them a much clearer
understanding of their conditions.
Comparing processes:
Film vs. digital radiography |
| Traditional (Film) |
Digital |
| Involves ongoing expenses for film and chemicals |
Incorporates a reusable phosphor plate |
| Involves smelly chemicals and their disposal |
Entire process is clean |
| Results are produced in 3 minutes |
Results are produced in less than 1 minute |
Produces a static image |
Image can be magnified, colorized, flipped, and contrast-enhanced |
| Requires film storage and darkroom space |
Allows extra space for patient care |
| Involves transporting films to radiologist |
Images can be sent instantly via e-mail |
Lower purchase price |
Requires a higher initial cost that can be amortized over
5 years; no consumables |
| Films need to be filed and retrieved physically and can
get lost |
Allows easy, immediate access to images on a computer hard
drive |
| Retakes may be necessary due to poor exposure |
Images can be enhanced; no retakes |
If you are currently using an X-ray
film processor, you know that it requires regular maintenance
and professional cleaning to run effectively and avoid costly
repairs. A film processor is an electromechanical device that
is full of corrosive chemistry. Film processing creates by-products
that must be cleaned away and disposed of. If this is not done
regularly, costly problems can ensue. Preventative maintenance
will save you a significant sum of money in the end.
A digital imaging system provides
a timesaving method of acquiring accurate diagnostic information
in less than one minute. While nobody wants to take an unnecessary
X-ray, there have probably been times when you didn’t take
another image because it would have taken too much time. When
it becomes more convenient, you are more likely to take the X-ray
you want because it can be done quickly and easily. By taking
images on a more consistent basis, you are actually performing
a greater service to your patient.
If your state law permits, you
can easily train an assistant to use a digital imaging processor.
This gives you more time to work directly with patients.
Digital imaging has much greater
exposure latitude than film and is more tolerant of under- or
over-exposure than standard X-ray film is. If the exposure is
not ideal, you can computer-enhance the image and avoid costly
retakes and unnecessary patient exposure.
Digital processors work in normal
light, generally take up only a small footprint, and produce images
in under a minute. In fact, the efficiency and speed of digital
radiography can shave almost 15 minutes off a patient visit.
The practitioner looking for a
clean, convenient, and cost-effective image processing system
— one that will pay back in savings over time as well as
provide optimal diagnostic image quality — may wish to run
the numbers and carefully weigh the costs and benefits to see
if digital makes sense for his practice now and into the future.
Frederick
R. Fischer is vice president of AllPro Imaging, Inc. (www.allproimaging.com),
a U.S. manufacturer of X-ray equipment for the medical profession.
He can be contacted at 621-434-6658, ext. 103 or by e-mail at john@amhe.com.
|