Chiropractic Economics Masthead
HomeMagazineNewsBuyers GuideStudentsCONTACT USSUBSCRIPTIONS
Spacer Advertisting
CLASSIFIEDSCARDPACK ONLINEDATEBOOKPAST ISSUESCHIRO HISTORYMARKETPLACE
Timeline 1985 1900s 1910s 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s
Line
 
Warning: Do not own home in your spouse’s name

The National Medical Foundation for Asset Protection warns doctors and other lawsuit-prone professionals against transferring homes and other personal assets into their spouses’ names for lawsuit protection. Not only does this strategy often not provide the supposed protection from malpractice lawsuits, but can even be the basis for fraud if not done according to specific guidelines.

The warning comes as legal consultants across the country continue to report widespread misconception in the medical community that owning family assets in the name of the less-vulnerable spouse is an effective strategy for asset protection. Some estate planners estimate as many as 20 percent to 30 percent of the nation’s medical doctors engage in this practice.

Jay W. Mitton, MBA, JD, widely regarded as the “Father of Asset Protection” and chair of the Foundation, blames the nation’s lawyers who often give this advice without understanding its implications.

Mitton cites the Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act and the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyances Act, which states that courts can now consider family relationships in lawsuit proceedings.

The statute explicitly says transferring family assets to immediate family members is fraudulent if done as a reaction to a lawsuit. Even if done before a lawsuit, courts may still find the arrangement as an implicit attempt to defraud creditors.

Secondary reasons for this warning include greatly complicated divorce proceedings, increased estate and property tax liabilities, and the possibility of non-physician spouses being sued independently.

Six states, including Texas, Florida, Kansas, Iowa, Oklahoma and South Dakota, have universal Homestead Exemption laws that protect homeowners’ residences from being seized in lawsuits. Homestead Exemption laws in the other 39 states are often inadequate for 21st Century housing prices with most protecting between $10,000-50,000 of equity in a homeowner’s primary residence, according to Mitton.

He recommends that professionals at risk of losing their homes in medical or dental malpractice lawsuits consider alternative forms of titling their assets, including single-member limited liability companies and family lLimited partnerships.

Source: National Medical Foundation for Asset Protection, http://www.nationalmedicalfoundation.org


 
Give us Feedback