| By
Robert Jusino, DC, MPH
Editor’s
note: In his article on “Leveraging yourself
through a PHO,” published in Vol. 50, Issue
5, Robert Jusino, DC, MPH, makes a case for joining
a PHO and tells how he did it. Here, he provides background
on managed care and physicians- hospital organizations
(PHOs).
Managed-care
practices in healthcare were introduced to slow down
the spiraling cost of health care services and to
counter the dominance of the medical profession in
this industry.
Health
Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) were made popular
in the 1970s as cost-containment vehicles that brought
about many changes in healthcare delivery, such as
preadmission reviews, utilization reviews, retrospective
case reviews and physician profiling.
The
HMO model transferred financial risk from the insurance
company to the primary-care physician (PCP), who is
paid on a capitated basis. If patients stay well (and
the PCP doesn’t have to deliver services), the
PCP comes out ahead.
Preferred
Provider Organizations (PPOs) become more popular
in the 1980s. These insurance programs allow members
some freedom to choose healthcare providers from an
established network. The preferred providers in these
organizations agree to discounted fees and some utilization
oversight from the insurance company.
Insurance
companies today serve as the “middleman”
in the healthcare system, theoretically facilitating
transactions between providers and healthcare consumers.
They facilitate, but in the HMO capitated model, they
pass the risk on to PCPs and keep a large portion
of premium dollars for themselves.
Physicians-hospital
organizations (PHOs) grew out of a need for healthcare
providers to negotiate effectively with HMOs/PPOs
since their members were the actual providers of the
healthcare services.
PHOs
have significant potential to cut out the middleman
and provide healthcare services directly
to healthcare consumers in the United States. PHO
groups could potentially merge into a national network
and displace insurance companies from the healthcare
industry and deal directly with employers and patients.
At
the current time, however, insurance laws in some
states prohibit PHOs from competing with them and
many PHOs are concerned about possible backlash of
delayed or denied payments and other repercussions
from insurance companies, since most of their business
would remain under the old insurance model.
Furthermore,
PHOs are local entities. They are not organized
nationally and cannot accommodate the needs of our
mobile society.
PHOs
have drawbacks, but they are especially attractive
to chiropractic physicians: They offer the opportunity
to access more patients without negotiating with individual
managed-care organizations.
|